News Article

At a glance

  • Voting system: Alternative Transferable Vote (ATV)
  • Individual voters: 1367
  • Turnout: 19% of the SOAS student body
  • Roles announced: Activities and Campaigns, Democracy and Education, Welfare and Liberation

SU Elections operate on an ATV voting system - Alternative Transferable Vote

How ATV works: Voters rank candidates in order of preference by marking 1, 2, 3 and so on. A voter can rank as many or as few candidates as they like, or vote for one candidate only.

As explained by UK Parliament:

First preference votes are counted first. If a candidate receives more than 50 per cent of the first preference votes, then they are elected.

If no candidate reaches 50 per cent, the candidate with the fewest first preference votes is eliminated. Their second preference votes are reallocated to the remaining candidates.

If one candidate has more votes than the other remaining candidates put together, that candidate is elected. If not, the process is repeated until one candidate has more votes than the other remaining candidates put together. This candidate wins the election.

If you are still a little confused, check out this handy video, which explains ATV a little further.

With 1367 individual voters, 19% of the SOAS student body voted in this year’s election. Please find the breakdown for the individual roles below.

Elected

Co-President Activities and Campaigns

Total votes cast: 1199

  • Re-Open Nominations was excluded at stage 2 with 10 votes.
  • Mohd. Arham Khan was excluded at stage 3 with 44 votes.
  • Sarah Choudhary was excluded at stage 4 with 139 votes.
  • Atiya Gaffar was excluded at stage 5 with 159 votes.
  • Sami Abdur Razzak was excluded at stage 6 with 188 votes.
  • Aleezay Shahbaz was excluded at stage 7 with 319 votes.

Claudia Nader was duly elected as Co-President Activities and Campaigns with 418 votes.

Elected

Co-President Democracy and Education

Total votes cast: 1139

  • Re-Open Nominations was excluded at stage 2 with 10 votes.
  • Fahim Fayez was excluded at stage 3 with 57 votes.
  • Yuchen Hu was excluded at stage 4 with 74 votes.
  • Leo Bodycote was excluded at stage 5 with 88 votes.
  • Adam Frost was excluded at stage 6 with 124 votes.
  • Germa Tsion Tekle Mariam was excluded at stage 7 with 141 votes.
  • Mariam Mansoor was excluded at stage 8 with 334 votes.

Samson Onwe was duly elected as Co-President Democracy and Education with 411 votes.

Elected

Co-President Welfare and Liberation

Total votes cast: 1111

  • Re-Open Nominations was excluded at stage 2 with 5 votes.
  • Beti Mcgreevy was excluded at stage 3 with 53 votes.
  • Nivea Palmer-Mckenzie was excluded at stage 4 with 139 votes.
  • Mari Tagami was excluded at stage 5 with 186 votes.
  • Mayowa Osideko was excluded at stage 6 with 212 votes.
  • Irini Resuello-Dauti was excluded at stage 7 with 260 votes.

Sana Irfan was duly elected as Co-President Welfare and Liberation with 367 votes.

Congratulations: A big well done to all candidates for standing in this election. There was a great atmosphere across campus during election week, with brilliant ideas and conversations throughout. Congratulations to Claudia, Samson and Sana.

Library Staff Statement on SOAS Cuts

SOAS Library staff restructure cuts 25% of Library staff and the services they deliver

Please see below a statement from SOAS Library staff on the cuts to Library staffing & services resulting from the One Professional Service proposals:

SOAS Library staff restructure cuts 25% of Library staff and the services they deliver

SOAS is currently restructuring all its professional Services departments. One aim of the restructure is to make approximately £1.55 million of savings on its current Professional Services annual salary budget of approximately £22.3 million.

Although cuts are being made across all Professional Services departments it seems as though the Library has been specifically targeted, with cuts of £650k-675k being made. The Library is being asked to make 43% of the total savings. This is despite Library staff making up only 13% of all non-academic staff.

This will result in the loss of 25% of current Library staff with the equivalent of 13 fte posts going by the end of July 2019. The aim is for around 30  posts to go across Professional Services as a whole, so almost half of these posts will come from the Library alone.

These cuts will have a devastating impact upon the services the Library is able to offer staff, students and visiting researchers.

Dedicated specialist librarian support for all subjects other than Law will go completely, with 4 specialist subject librarians losing their jobs. Support for Law has been attached to a newly created managerial post which will hugely diminish the level of support available for Law staff & students. All other subject support work will be re-allocated to the remaining regional librarians although there is no indication in the plan of how this will be done.

What is clear, however, is that the substantial additional subject workload will impact negatively upon the regionally focused work which these staff currently do in supporting the local, national & international research communities through SOAS Library’s role as a National Research Library.

As one of only five National Research Libraries (the others being Oxford, Cambridge, LSE & the University of Manchester) SOAS Library receives around £670k of annual funding from Research England. Might this be in jeopardy given these re-allocations of workload?

SOAS Archives & Special Collections are also substantially negatively impacted by the proposed changes with losses of staff at all levels. Again this raises specific concerns in relation to the continued allocation of Research England special funding.

Frontline services to support all library users, but particularly SOAS undergraduate & postgraduate students will be decimated through this plan with the number of staff working in this area reduced from 12 to 6. This will mean a massively increased reliance on self- service but with no investment to upgrade existing poor self-service facilities.

The Library will also be losing staff who provide dedicated support for e-resources, distance learning and transnational education at a time when support in all these areas needs to be expanded.

Changes to shelving staff contracts will mean that items will take longer to be re-shelved and cuts in the section which acquires new material will mean that new books will take longer to arrive & longer to reach the shelves on arrival. Similarly, email enquiries will be dealt with more slowly.

Particularly worrying is the fact that the plans make no reference at all to any specific continued dedicated  library staff support for students with disabilities or specific learning differences.

Although the Library as a whole will be making savings of £650k-£675k  these cuts are being made exclusively across the five lowest paid grades at which Library staff are currently employed. Astonishingly the number of managerial posts across the three highest paid grades increases by one, with an extra post on the top grade & two new posts one grade lower. However 15 of the remaining posts on non-managerial levels are proposed to be line-managed by one person on a non-managerial grade. This will leave 8 managers on the top three grades managing a total of only 19 staff.

Library staff are constantly told that SOAS Library compares poorly in terms of expenditure on Library staff with ‘comparable libraries in the sector’ but we are never given a clear indication of which these comparable libraries are or exactly how we compare badly. The ‘rationale’ document which was released along with the new structure diagram is vague & gives no context to the proposed changes. Library staff are being asked to engage with the process & make decisions about their futures without full job descriptions for each of the new posts. Instead only short bullet point ‘role descriptors’ have been released, and not even for all new posts.

The vague aspirational objectives given in the rationale document are actually rendered completely unachievable by the new structure and the scale of the cuts.

All the Professional Services restructure proposals are currently out for consultation but the consultation period is short, closing on 11 January 2019.

SOAS staff can view the diagram of the proposed new library staff structure, the rationale document & the role descriptors under Annex G at:

https://soas.us13.list-manage.com/track/click?u=ca1333c711ff70fb79c1f4cf0&id=382448851b&e=48637011c2

We would ask SOAS staff, students and any external interested parties to please support our campaign to oppose these proposed scathing cuts by submitting comments to the consultation procedure email address: onepsconsultation@soas.ac.uk

Please also sign the petition at:

https://tinyurl.com/SaveSOASLibrary

Show support for the campaign by following @SaveSOASLibrary  on Twitter. Please use hashtags #SaveSOASLibrary & #librarycuts.

If you tweet support please tag in SOAS Director Baroness Valerie Amos @ValerieAmos and incoming SOAS Library Director (starts on 14 Jan 2019) Oliver Urquhart-Irvine @Urquhart_Irvine

In this section

Explore our news articles

Find out what is going on at SOAS SU and beyond

View all articles
Powered by MSL